K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Maintenance, guides, and walkthroughs for your PCX. Please do not post questions about repairing or fixing your bike here.

Moderator: Modsquad

MKE PCX
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 88
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 4:17 pm
Year: 2013
Color: Black
Location: Germantown, WI

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by MKE PCX »

I'd like to chime in here with my opinion on air filters.

Every time I see filters being discussed on forums people throw around the word airflow and talk about increased air volume. What I rarely, if ever, see mentioned are velocity and pressure.

The reason that people are experiencing a loss in performance on the low end with a high flow drop-in or pod is due to a decrease in intake air pressure.

When you increase the volume of air coming in through the filter without increasing the engine's demand for air, your net result is increased air velocity and decreased intake air pressure.

Velocity is determined by the ratio of intake air volume to the cross-sectional area of your throttle body opening. If you allow more air than necessary past the filter you speed up the velocity through the throttle body at the cost of pressure. The pressure of the intake air is what helps it flow into the combustion chamber. Decreasing pressure is the opposite of what you want when looking to gain performance.

If you were to do nothing but change the filter to a high-flow and dyno the bike, you'd notice a decrease in torque from In the first 60-70% of the RPM range and a very minor increase in HP in the upper RPM range. Whether or not this trade off is worth it is up to you, but your torque loss will be greater than your HP gain.

I'm just some guy on the internet so, like any information you find there, take this analysis with a grain of salt. In my opinion the high flow filters are best left to the big bore kits with larger throttle bodies.
User avatar
dasshreddar
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 11:34 am
Year: forzaruckuspcx
Color: black
Location: central coast california

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by dasshreddar »

When I installed my pod, it did nothing but increase noise (no performance losses though).
Adding an open exhaust gave me a boost however..., but I had the pod on before the exhaust so not sure if it was the exhaust alone? :geek:
forza300
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:25 pm
Year: 2015
Color: White
Location: 'Straylia

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by forza300 »

For what it's worth I installed a SIMOTA high-flow airfilter and junked the snorkel. (from Taiwan - cheaper but otherwise exactly the same as BMC / K&N etc).

As with every motor vehicle I have ever fitted a high-flow airfilter to (from inline 4's, twins, triples even cars and utes)... I notice absolutely zero difference whatsoever. Maybe an ant's whisker louder due to de-snorkeling but in the underground car park even an ant's fart will echo off the walls to some degree. Probably my imagination.

Seat of the pants-o-meter results are inconclusive to say the least but I reckon the snorkel removal is worth at least 0.05kg :roll: and that alone should recover some 0.0001kph with a tailwind. :D
------------------------
forza300
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 8:25 pm
Year: 2015
Color: White
Location: 'Straylia

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by forza300 »

Hey guys and girls,

I just went for a ride and can confirm the snorkel removal results in the most wonderful, deep note from the engine. Really nice, I highly recommend taking it out and trying for yourself (takes all of 1 minute to remove airbox cover, take out removable snorkel and refit cover).

I enjoy the deep bass resonating from the airbox cover now. It's not loud, just noticeable.

Ah, the old airbox tinkering trick. Never ceases to amaze me the difference it makes in engine note.

:D
------------------------
User avatar
vamootsman
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 271
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 10:42 pm
Year: 2013
Color: Red
Location: Bettendorf, Iowa

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by vamootsman »

Agreed, sounds like motor instead of a sewing machine. i am aware that my K&N install may not increase performance at all, but it sounds great and I now have a cleanable cone filter that will last as long as my scoot.
2013 PCX 150 with,
Givi Tall Screen, and E370 Top Case
NCY Variator and Face Plate, 12 gram rollers
Takagawa Silent Oval Exhaust, K&N R1100 pod filter mod
YSS XL Rear Shock Absorbers Michelin City Grip 120/70 Front 140/70 Rear
2013 Honda CB500X with Rally Raid kit
2005 Piaggio X9 500 Evolution
1982 Honda CX500 Turbo
1983 Honda Nighthawk S
User avatar
kramnala58
Mod Emeritus
Mod Emeritus
Posts: 2864
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 7:49 am
Color: White is faster
Location: Niagara Falls, USA

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by kramnala58 »

This sounds and works sweet too.
PCX Canister Breather 02.jpg
PCX Canister Breather 02.jpg (91.99 KiB) Viewed 4826 times
PCX Canister Breather 01.jpg
PCX Canister Breather 01.jpg (100.73 KiB) Viewed 4826 times
2010 Honda PCX 125 in Thailand (White) - "White Lightning" Sold in Sept 2017 :(
2009 Yamaha Majesty YP400 in USA (Metalic Titanium) - "The Throne" Sold in June 2020 :(
User avatar
Mel46
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 6959
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 5:13 pm
Year: 2013
Color: red PCX
Location: Dallas, Ga USA

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by Mel46 »

http://www.knfilters.com/mobile/mProduc ... od=HA-1213
Here is an update on the K&N filter. They have one for 2013 pcx 150 now.
Currently own:
Red 2013 Honda PCX150

Givi tall windshield & tailbox - Lots of extra lights
Custom seat from Thailand - Bad Boy Airhorn
Takegawa Lowering Shocks - Michelin City Grip Tires
Headlight assy upgraded to LEDs w/HS5 main bulbs
NCY variator, drive face, and rollers
User avatar
St.Clair
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:17 am
Year: 2015
Color: Black & Red
Location: Thailand
Contact:

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by St.Clair »

kramnala58 wrote:This sounds and works sweet too.
PCX Canister Breather 02.jpg
PCX Canister Breather 01.jpg


I love the sound of this one. How the PCX a is supposed to sound IMHO ..... Covers up the Ricky ticky noise. What gram rollers are you on. I love the 12gram with this air filters. Also is your adjustable.
I do not think there is any thrill that can go through the human heart like that felt by the inventor as he sees some creation of the brain unfolding to success... such emotions make a man forget food, sleep, friends, love, everything.
Nikola Tesla
User avatar
Oyabun
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:24 pm
Year: `12,`15,`19
Color: black&black
Location: Europe

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by Oyabun »

I use a Simota air filter. It has larger filtering surface than the K&N.
User avatar
Oyabun
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 4:24 pm
Year: `12,`15,`19
Color: black&black
Location: Europe

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by Oyabun »

MKE PCX wrote:I'd like to chime in here with my opinion on air filters.

Every time I see filters being discussed on forums people throw around the word airflow and talk about increased air volume. What I rarely, if ever, see mentioned are velocity and pressure.

The reason that people are experiencing a loss in performance on the low end with a high flow drop-in or pod is due to a decrease in intake air pressure.

When you increase the volume of air coming in through the filter without increasing the engine's demand for air, your net result is increased air velocity and decreased intake air pressure.

Velocity is determined by the ratio of intake air volume to the cross-sectional area of your throttle body opening. If you allow more air than necessary past the filter you speed up the velocity through the throttle body at the cost of pressure. The pressure of the intake air is what helps it flow into the combustion chamber. Decreasing pressure is the opposite of what you want when looking to gain performance.

If you were to do nothing but change the filter to a high-flow and dyno the bike, you'd notice a decrease in torque from In the first 60-70% of the RPM range and a very minor increase in HP in the upper RPM range. Whether or not this trade off is worth it is up to you, but your torque loss will be greater than your HP gain.

I'm just some guy on the internet so, like any information you find there, take this analysis with a grain of salt. In my opinion the high flow filters are best left to the big bore kits with larger throttle bodies.
Partially correct.
Flow speed and velocity, and pressure are equally important characteristics. Even more especially in a thumper single cylinder engine like the pcx or forza the flow is never smooth but a fluctuating so it works very differently than a continously flowing system.
An ideal filtering element should provide unlimited flow and flow regulation should be done elsewhere. In case e only changes the filter, but other elements of the intake are untouched then the only thing happens that you have reduced a possible bootle neck at the filtering element - as the flow is limited by the connecting pipe, diameter of the throttle and the throughput of the head intake channels and intake valve.
j.d.b.
Forum Benefactor
Forum Benefactor
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 4:59 pm
Year: 2013
Color: red
Location: Michigan

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by j.d.b. »

I helped out on a big air cleaner study some years back. It was for a small diesel, but still had some interesting findings. One was that the OE filter flowed better and cleaned better than K&N. They sacrifice fine filtering for flow as it turns out.
User avatar
jblye
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:39 pm
Year: 2015
Color: Black
Location: South Carolina

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by jblye »

Just adding a higher flow air filter isn't likely to make a significant increase in power,
since the stock muffler canister still limits air flow through the engine. You might
gain another hp or two by installing a higher flow aftermarket canister as well.

In any event, the stock engine is already producing 13.6 hp from 9 cubic inches, so any
big power increases would require much more radical changes to the engine than
just increasing the air flow......and those kind of upgrades could put you near the
Forza price range at some point.....and possibly cause reliability problems and
frequent drive belt changes.

Every motorcycle that I have ever owned had Stage 1 engine performance mods
(in one case, a factory race kit); however, I decided to just leave the PCX motor
stock. For around town riding, that seems to be good enough for me.....but some
people really enjoy making more power from the little PCX motor just for the joy
of it, and that is OK, too. Whatever......

J.
User avatar
clemence
Regular User
Regular User
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2014 3:51 pm
Location: Bali, Indonesia
Contact:

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by clemence »

maddiedog wrote:At least you'll never have to buy a paper filter. ;)
Nice review and test Maddie. I just sold my old Vario125 and bought a new Vario150 because the PCX is ridiculously overpriced here. Vario150 share the same engine as PCX150 but much lighter and with only half the price. ;)
I just want to share how you can reuse your OEM paper filter over and over again:
My Vario125 odometer was 40k+ km when I sold it. And I've never bought any air filter other than what came with the bike. I clean it in every oil change (between 4000-5000km, whenever I remember to change it)
The cleaning procedure is simple:
1. flush the dirty filter with CLEAN fresh gasoline from inside out. Never reuse the the gasoline. You'll need 1 liter of gasoline for a dirty filter. I just use squirt bottle to clean the pleated paper filter.
2. Immediately when the filter is still wet soaked with gasoline, shower it with hot water ( inside out). I use hot shower set to max. (85C). Keep showering until there's no oil left in the filter.
3. Dry it. Under the sun or just use the hair dryer.
4. Oil the paper with 10-15cc clean engine oil. I tried more than 15cc using 10W30, not good, the engine bog down. The best method to oil it evenly is to use vacuum cleaner behind the filter while you spray the oil using detail touch up airbrush gun.
5. reinstall the filter
RuckinEMT
New Member
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:33 am
Year: 2017 PCX 150eSP
Color: Pearl White
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by RuckinEMT »

I just installed the K&N in my 2017. Seems to be quicker. The engine noise is a bit more excessive. Any thoughts on what would cause that?
chicaboo
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 12:55 am

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by chicaboo »

RuckinEMT wrote:I just installed the K&N in my 2017. Seems to be quicker. The engine noise is a bit more excessive. Any thoughts on what would cause that?
I noticed absolutely no difference in performance with my K&N filter.
And my aftermarket exhaust was already too loud to hear any change in induction noise over it.

BUT, take that resonator (everyone calls it the "outer snorkel"...) out of the airbox and hear that tractor turn! o_O
The PCX has very noisy induction, and the stock setup does a marvellous job of quelling all that unwanted noise.

I'm not really surprised you can hear a difference with a stock muffler. But I doubt you'll hear a difference over the Yoshi.
RuckinEMT
New Member
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:33 am
Year: 2017 PCX 150eSP
Color: Pearl White
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by RuckinEMT »

chicaboo wrote:
RuckinEMT wrote:I just installed the K&N in my 2017. Seems to be quicker. The engine noise is a bit more excessive. Any thoughts on what would cause that?
I noticed absolutely no difference in performance with my K&N filter.
And my aftermarket exhaust was already too loud to hear any change in induction noise over it.

BUT, take that resonator (everyone calls it the "outer snorkel"...) out of the airbox and hear that tractor turn! o_O
The PCX has very noisy induction, and the stock setup does a marvellous job of quelling all that unwanted noise.

I'm not really surprised you can hear a difference with a stock muffler. But I doubt you'll hear a difference over the Yoshi.

Perhaps its in my head? ha! Low speeds are definitely faster, not by much. I haven't had a chance to get it up full speed. I'm going to double check the filter to make sure it's installed properly.

Also, No Yosh yet. :| Hoping to figure out why the header pipe doesn't fit. The only thing I can think of is the redesign of the center stand. Ugh.
chicaboo
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2016 12:55 am

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by chicaboo »

RuckinEMT wrote:
chicaboo wrote:
RuckinEMT wrote:I just installed the K&N in my 2017. Seems to be quicker. The engine noise is a bit more excessive. Any thoughts on what would cause that?
I noticed absolutely no difference in performance with my K&N filter.
And my aftermarket exhaust was already too loud to hear any change in induction noise over it.

BUT, take that resonator (everyone calls it the "outer snorkel"...) out of the airbox and hear that tractor turn! o_O
The PCX has very noisy induction, and the stock setup does a marvellous job of quelling all that unwanted noise.

I'm not really surprised you can hear a difference with a stock muffler. But I doubt you'll hear a difference over the Yoshi.

Perhaps its in my head? ha! Low speeds are definitely faster, not by much. I haven't had a chance to get it up full speed. I'm going to double check the filter to make sure it's installed properly.

Also, No Yosh yet. :| Hoping to figure out why the header pipe doesn't fit. The only thing I can think of is the redesign of the center stand. Ugh.
If you look on the bottom left side of the crankcase near the oil screen bolt, does it say 149cc or 153cc?
Also, 125 and 150 PCX's don't have interchangeable exhausts. But I'm wondering about the 149cc EU spec...
RuckinEMT
New Member
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:33 am
Year: 2017 PCX 150eSP
Color: Pearl White
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by RuckinEMT »

It's the 153CC ESP version. Also, I know the exhausts are not interchangeable. When I spoke to the sales rep at Yosh, I made it very clear It was for a 2017 PCX 150
RuckinEMT
New Member
New Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:33 am
Year: 2017 PCX 150eSP
Color: Pearl White
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by RuckinEMT »

Figured it out... they sent me the non eSP header pipe. Hoping they can expedite one from Japan...
User avatar
easyrider
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster
Posts: 1597
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2015 6:23 pm
Year: 2013
Color: blk
Location: Long Island , NY, Tampa, Ft laud

Re: K&N Air filter Installation and Performance Analysis

Post by easyrider »

I didn't see any difference in my Corvette when I added it. GM specifically states that a KN filter voids warranty and that it can cause damage and poor performance. It was well known that the oil residue used in those filters can be drawn in and plate the mass air flow sensor wire on a car and give erroneous resistance measurements to the CPU hence resulting in poor performance and those style air filters can attract dirt and plug sooner hence more cleaning. I dunno how it will function on a bike and even if they have a MAF.. but Maddiedog did a very good real world test .
Post Reply